
photo credit: CCCPxokkeu
It is a shameful testament to the enormous political lobbying power of the American livestock industry that they have connived to get the gray wolf removed from the Endangered Species List.
What is not often understood is that the vast majority of the land - Wyoming, Idaho and Montana plus parts of Utah, Oregon and Washington – has no wolf population in any case. So why bother de-listing the wolf in these areas?
Explains Michael Robinson, from the Center for Biological Diversity:
Wolves periodically show up in these areas, which include national forests and other public lands, but because most of these regions are severely grazed by livestock — so much so that deer and elk don’t find enough to eat and are very rare — the wolves end up killing stock and the federal government traps and kills them or shoots them from the air.
The purpose of the delisting is to kill as many wolves as the livestock-industry can get away with to ensure that fewer wolves enter these severely grazed regions, fewer show up anywhere where stock are pastured, and, on a broader scale, that no wolves survive to disperse outside of the “recovered” zone and establish themselves in states such as Colorado where they would enjoy full legal protection; they will be killed en route.
Don’t entirely blame the Bush administration for this; if you eat the burgers, your cash is facilitating this slaughter.
No other post on this day.
It is sad when beautiful animals are swept aside like street rubbish. They were made extict, I believe in the 16th century in England. It has been stated that there are no known attacks on man by the European wolf and because we no longer have them in Britain there is no natural preditor of the fox. European wolves, apparently survive in very small packs. I’m not sure but I think that the wolf you describe exists in life-long pairs.
A beautiful article - perhaps people should focus more on the hazards of bull terriers these, after all have no fears of man!